If My framing of a situation makes a person tilt their head and say "Hey, I didn't see that before," good: it's an inkling of motion. If My tone brings someone up short and makes them pause, good: it's a start.
#Jenius read inkling con full#
But here's the thing: until you get the other's person full attention, you don't have a chance at a meaningful dialogue. Yes, We should try to enhance the dialogue rather than add to the shouting. Like I care.) And pointing out that what Our "leaders" are trying to do almost NEVER has anything to do with OUR welfare but has EVERYTHING to do with THEIRS- and WHY-is absolutely necessary-because not enough of Us are doing it. Encapsulating a defective political leader with a nickname is fun (if you oppose him/her otherwise, it ticks you off. Calling a muddy spade a dirty shovel is satisfying. Could I improve on it? Seems to me I could only do so by altering the tone.
What makes Me right are My ideas, the framework they are presented in and the conclusions, which are very often right. However, I see The Jenius as the darker side and the permanent record of things I tend to say in public, about politicians, business leaders, the media and the gamut of topics covered here.ĭoes it make me right? No, My tone is probably-if not certainly-wrong. A positive attitude does help and I have commented long before Pax that I get down on Myself for the consistent negativity, a trait I don't evince in My off-Jenius life. Pax brings up a cogent point in one of his comments to "We're Number 35! We're Number 35!" in that a negative tone and sarcasm are not conducive to change and that by engaging in that manner, one contributes to the problem and not the solution.Īgreed. From Day One of The Jenius, I've had gentle and even very ungentle reactions from My posts, in terms of words, concepts and tone. Thanks to Jenius Reader/Commenter Pax, I've become a little more aware of what I say and how I say it.
0 kommentar(er)
